Workforce planning used to be a once-a-year exercise.
In today’s supply chain environment, that approach no longer works.
Between:
…workforce planning has become a strategic capability, not an administrative task.
As leaders look toward 2026, the question is no longer:
“How many people do we need?”
It’s:
“How do we build a workforce model that can adapt, scale, and perform consistently under pressure?”
This checklist outlines the critical workforce planning questions every distribution leader should be answering now — and where managed labor partners like FHI fit into a modern plan.
Many operations plan labor based on:
High-performing DCs plan based on:
Key questions:
Why it matters:
If labor planning is built on averages, you’ll always be behind during peaks.
Rigid labor models struggle in volatile environments.
Ask:
Managed labor introduces elasticity:
2026-ready operations design flexibility on purpose.
Coverage answers:
“Do we have enough people?”
Productivity answers:
“Can we hit throughput targets efficiently and consistently?”
Key checks:
Workforce planning that ignores productivity leads to:
Managed labor helps shift the conversation from hours to output.
Labor plans often ignore leadership bandwidth.
Ask honestly:
Without leadership capacity:
FHI’s embedded leadership model helps protect supervisory bandwidth and maintain execution discipline.
Turnover isn’t a surprise.
It’s a known variable.
Key planning questions:
Smart workforce plans:
Managed labor reduces volatility by stabilizing staffing and shortening ramp curves.
Fatigue is a workforce planning issue — not just a safety one.
Ask:
Chronic OT is often a signal of:
2026-ready plans prioritize sustainable pace, not heroics.
Automation doesn’t eliminate labor — it changes labor.
Ask:
Many automation projects underperform because labor wasn’t planned correctly.
Managed labor partners help:
Misalignment creates friction.
Ask:
Workforce planning works best when:
…are discussed together — not in silos.
Managed labor provides a common operating language across teams.
Ask yourself:
If the answer is:
“We’ll figure it out.”
That’s risk.
Strong plans include:
Managed labor becomes a built-in contingency, not a last-minute scramble.
Managed labor isn’t about replacing internal teams.
It’s about stabilizing and strengthening the system.
FHI supports workforce planning by:
In a 2026-ready model, managed labor is:
a strategic layer — not a reactionary fix.
Workforce planning for 2026 isn’t about predicting the future perfectly.
It’s about building a labor model that:
The most resilient distribution centers don’t ask:
“How do we survive the next surge?”
They ask:
“How do we design a workforce that performs no matter what comes next?”
That’s the difference between reacting — and leading.
Q1: What makes workforce planning different heading into 2026?
Greater volatility, tighter labor markets, automation complexity, and higher service expectations require more flexible labor models.
Q2: Why is flexibility so important in workforce planning?
Because volume and order profiles change faster than traditional hiring models can respond.
Q3: How does managed labor support workforce planning?
By providing scalable capacity, embedded leadership, and predictable productivity without overloading internal teams.
Q4: Should workforce planning focus more on productivity or headcount?
Productivity. Headcount without performance leads to higher costs and instability.
Q5: How often should workforce plans be revisited?
Continuously. High-performing organizations review labor assumptions quarterly — or faster in volatile environments.
👇📅 We're here to help. There's no pitch - just a conversation. 📅👇