When demand spikes, the quickest solution is often the costliest one: overtime. On paper, it seems efficient—no new hires, no onboarding, just more hours from your existing team. But beneath that short-term fix lies a long-term problem: fatigue, errors, and rising cost-per-case.
In contrast, a managed labor program scales output through structure, not exhaustion. It brings trained, supervised teams who maintain productivity and safety while keeping your budget predictable. Let’s look at why managed labor consistently outperforms overtime across every metric that matters.
Overtime feels simple—until you measure it.
According to OSHA and the National Safety Council, employees working extended hours experience a 60% increase in fatigue-related incidents and a 20–25% drop in productivity after 9 hours on shift.
The costs compound fast:
Bottom line: you’re paying more for less performance.
A managed labor model flips the equation—it adds capacity through control, not cost escalation.
Here’s how:
| Factor | Overtime Model | Managed Labor Model |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Control | Variable, increases with volume | Predictable rate with performance tied to KPIs |
| Fatigue Impact | High | Managed via shift balancing |
| Supervision | Often stretched thin | Dedicated onsite leadership |
| Scalability | Limited by hours | Scales through workforce deployment |
| Quality & Safety | Declines over time | Maintained through continuous coaching |
Fatigue kills throughput. Managed labor teams maintain stable case rates through fresh rotations and shift discipline.
Metric: Managed labor programs sustain 10–15% higher sustained CPH vs. fatigued overtime crews.
The CDC links fatigue to slower reaction times and poor decision-making—the same root causes of most warehouse incidents.
FHI’s model, aligned with OSHA’s 1910.178 standards, integrates safety into every workflow instead of treating it as a compliance task.
Overtime turns variable demand into unpredictable expense. Managed labor replaces that chaos with performance-based contracts, giving CFOs:
It’s not just cheaper—it’s measurable.
When associates feel perpetually overworked, engagement plummets. A study by Gallup found that highly engaged teams see 81% lower absenteeism and 23% higher profitability.
Managed labor teams absorb surge pressure so your full-time staff can maintain sustainable schedules, reducing burnout and turnover.
Managed labor isn’t a temporary patch—it’s a performance layer you can expand or contract as needed.
Result: Output increases, costs stabilize, and managers regain control.
Overtime buys hours; managed labor builds performance.
As operations face sustained pressure—from e-commerce peaks to labor shortages—control, consistency, and visibility will always outperform fatigue-driven fixes.
The warehouses that win the next decade won’t just run harder.
They’ll run smarter.
Q1: Isn’t overtime cheaper than bringing in new labor?
Not when you factor in fatigue, turnover, and rising insurance exposure. Managed labor maintains cost-per-case while reducing hidden losses.
Q2: How fast can managed labor ramp up during peak season?
Typically within 10–14 days for existing accounts, leveraging cross-trained associates and embedded supervisors.
Q3: What KPIs define success for managed labor?
Cases-per-hour (CPH), cost-per-case (CPC), safety metrics, and attendance reliability.
Q4: How does managed labor impact warehouse culture?
It complements existing teams, relieving burnout and reinforcing accountability through structured coaching.
Q5: When should a facility move from overtime to managed labor?
When overtime exceeds 10–15% of total hours for more than three consecutive months—it’s time for a scalable model.
👇📅 We're here to help. There's no pitch - just a conversation. 📅👇